My fellow Americans:
Have you heard the latest trend in media reporting? It seems you can’t not-hire someone who’s black, gay or a woman without it being BECAUSE they’re black, gay, or a woman. You can’t even voice an opinion giving a clear reason why you’d not hire that person – it has to be about something you’re discriminating against, not about the problems that would be associated with that individual.
The thing making me think this way is the Tony Dungy comments regarding Micheal Sam the last two days. For those not following the story: In a comment made to the Tampa Bay Tribune about the recent NFL Draft published on Sunday, Tony Dungy said:
“I wouldn’t have taken him. Not because I don’t believe Michael Sam should have a chance to play, but I wouldn’t want to deal with all of it.It’s not going to be totally smooth … things will happen.”
I first read – and commented – on the issue on the CBSSports.com page – if you want to dig into the 6900 comments to try to find mine, be my guest. (I should be somewhere between 3700-3900, allowing for responses to responses.) I did also comment on my facebook page, however, stating:
Just read an article on Tony Dungy’s statements about how he’d not have picked Micheal Sam in the NFL draft, and I can respect his opinion. We’ve come a long way from segregated leagues and racism in Sports, but there’s still a lot of bigotry and bullying going on, as last year’s incident leading to the departure of Richie Incognito from the Miami Dolphins demonstrated. The problem when you break new ground and fight for equality and respect when you’re different than what some can accept is that, apart from the distraction surrounding the player, you have to contend with those who can not accept what you are – something that creates a headache/nightmare for those around you, such as your coach. Dungy already dealt with this once for himself, so I could understand his desire not to deal with it twice. Sometimes what we assume of as bigotry is simply honesty in admitting what you can/can not handle, and I think it’s equally as brave to admit that maybe you’re not the best person for a particular situation than to step up now only to back away later.
My opinion on the matter hasn’t changed – to me, it’s the media making a mountain out of a molehole, blowing something out of proportion. Dungy gave a clear, simple, honest response about a situation that had no bias or hatred towards Micheal Sam or his sexuality.
Unfortunately, the media’s making something out of nothing – and people are making a big stink of it.
On the one side, you have his supporters, many of whom are either Christian or homophobic, commenting on these forums or as articles themselves. Their support draws from these two areas, about how homosexuality is a sin against God and is unnatural, and are taking Dungy’s comments as such – not surprising, since Dungy is a Christian. The worst was probably Rush Limbaugh’s opinion, which (sadly) was somewhat accurate in how the Rams are a social experiment this year but was full of his usual subtext.
Then there’s the other side, who feel that Dungy’s Christian views are getting in the way, or that he is a homophobe. Much like how there are Democratic supporters who feel that the biggest reason Obama is having problems is because he’s black, there are people who feel that Dungy is bigoted in his views, and that no one can or should voice an opinion of descent against Micheal Sam. The Fumble is among those voices, arguing against his support of Micheal Vick and Marvin Harrison – both of whose major problems came AFTER they were NFL players.
It’s become so bad, in fact, that yesterday Dungy had to release a press statement (which I read about through FOXSports.com) about his comments:
On Monday afternoon while on vacation with my family, I was quite surprised to read excerpts from an interview I gave several weeks ago related to this year’s NFL Draft, and I feel compelled to clarify those remarks.
I was asked whether I would have drafted Michael Sam and I answered that would not have drafted him. I gave my honest answer, which is that I felt drafting him would bring much distraction to the team. At the time of my interview, the Oprah Winfrey reality show that was going to chronicle Michael’s first season had been announced.
I was not asked whether or not Michael Sam deserves an opportunity to play in the NFL. He absolutely does.
I was not asked whether his sexual orientation should play a part in the evaluation process. It should not.
I was not asked whether I would have a problem having Michael Sam on my team. I would not.
I have been asked all of those questions several times in the last three months and have always answered them the same way by saying that playing in the NFL is, and should be, about merit.
What I was asked about was my philosophy of drafting, a philosophy that was developed over the years, which was to minimize distractions for my teams.
I do not believe Michael’s sexual orientation will be a distraction to his teammates or his organization.
I do, however, believe that the media attention that comes with it will be a distraction. Unfortunately we are all seeing this play out now, and I feel badly that my remarks played a role in the distraction.
I wish Michael Sam nothing but the best in his quest to become a star in the NFL and I am confident he will get the opportunity to show what he can do on the field.
My sincere hope is that we will be able to focus on his play and not on his sexual orientation.
This statement wasn’t enough to quiet some sites and people – SBNation titled one of their articles, “Tony Dungy should stop talking about Michael Sam.” Keith Obermann, meanwhile, has commented that Dungy is “The worst person in the world” right now.
Micheal Sam, for the most part, has kept it respectful, according to the Sporting News, while Jason Collins, another gay athlete in the NBA, commented about certain “Code words” in a recent Youtube video.
To me, however, all of this is stupid and wrong on so many levels it’s approaching ridiculousness.
First, just because he supported and mentored Micheal Vick when he was released from jail and returned to the NFL, and just because he supported Marvin Harrison then, how do you know he still would support them today? Furthermore, how do you know he would/would not draft them where they up for the draft today, knowing what he knows now? It’s easy to call someone a hypocrite without taking into account that those experiences may have changed his mind about them, or that, while he may/did help and support them as NFL players, he wouldn’t have done the same were they college players. It’s easy to use the past against someone – it’s difficult to understand what they took away from those experiences, however.
Second, and I hate to break the news to you: Correlating opposition to same-sex marriage as homophobia or hatred is ignorant and often inaccurate. There are plenty of people I know who are Christians and have friends who are gay, yet feel that marriage is a unique union that solely exists between people of the opposite sex. There’s no hatred involved, just a deeper respect in their interpretation of what the Holy Bible says. Saying that Dungy’s support of an organization against Gay Marriage is proof of his inability to work with gay people isn’t always an accurate way to assess a situation.
Third, and I’ve mentioned this before: Dungy didn’t say anything offensive. By Sam choosing to announce he sexuality before the NFL Draft, he opened a can of worms that will create problems – mainly, unwanted attention. Dungy’s not an idiot: he knows how this attention will affect the team, both on and off the field, and he knows how he works. When you’re dealing with proven elements that have shown resilience to such problems as we well as excellent performance in the game, it’s easier to stand by someone and support them – not as easy with someone who’s a relative unknown. Dungy didn’t mention any hatred or malice: He stated that he knew what Sam was bringing to the table, and knew he wouldn’t have wanted it. That’s not bigoted at all.
Furthermore – and I have to ask this – what does his sexuality have to do with the game? Sure, it might be something necessary and important for the management and doctors to know (if he gets injured or, as the press has shown involving Micheal Sam, the press pesters him about it), but does it affect how he runs, how he tackles, or how he plays the game? What gay people like Micheal Sam fail to realize, as do the media that makes such a stink about these matters, is that, unlike age or gender which are mostly, if not completely, visible on the outside, THEY DON’T HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING UNLESS SOMETHING MAJOR HAPPENS. We’ve matured as a society past the point of connecting gay people to AIDS, or have to worry about players like Earvin “Magic” Johnson risking injury to other players who might contract the disease through him. If Sam were on the Chicago Bears (the team I root for) the only thing that would matter is how he played in the last game – and I’d only want to trade or fire him if his performance was consistently bad. (I would say “if he sucked” – something I normally say about someone doing a bad job – but in this case the language really is important.)
The thing that concerns me the most, especially with my career and life goals and in regards to this incident, is the perception of what you say to the world versus how it is interpreted. As a nobody I can say and do as I want, and the only worries I’ll need to consider with the consequences are from my current and future employers and clients. Were I to be more famous, however, I’d have to be more careful and considerate, as Dungy had tried being here. Interpretation is important, though, because I shouldn’t have to worry that my choice in firing or hiring someone is going to result in my job security or bank being compromised for it. Furthermore, I shouldn’t have to worry that someone else is going to interpret my actions as being anything but those actions: That, if I choose not to hire someone, it’s not because of something that they are, but because I found the best person for the job. Likewise, if I fire someone, it has nothing to do with anything more than the job itself. My views as a Christian, a white man, or how famous I am should not matter, nor should any comments I make to the such matter.
I still respect Dungy’s remarks, and feel he was right to say them. This concept that we need to tiptoe/babystep around everything to avoid offending people and avoid being honest is getting to be annoying and idiotic. No one should be shamed for voicing dissent on a situation that they know will be ugly, even if you’re a former head coach of the team that beat your team a few Superbowls back.
Normally, when something starts eating at me, I let it sit in me for a few days to see how I really feel. I don’t like rushing things, especially with things of importance. Continue reading
Welcome back – today’s song is a bit of a different spin, a little electronica from The Prodigy.
The album this is from, “The Fat of the Land,” is one of the few electronica albums I can listen all of the way through, owing to having much of the same energy as a good rock album. As far as singles released, it’s a favorite of the band – though I wish they’d have released “Mindfields,” which appeared on a couple of soundtrack to “The Matrix,” and “Narayan,” which has an awesome chant towards the end.
I needed something funky and with a beat, of which this song has plenty of.
Tuesdays and Thursdays are my political science class nights, and I’m really enjoying it. I don’t feel so invalid, I’m learning about why things are so messed up, and I’m even working on something that may need said system.
Wednesdays – those not wrapped up in tests, as mine is supposed to be preparing for tonight – are usually spent in a PSC “hangover,” giving thought to how to fix the problems and expand the knowledge. That’s why I chose this song today.
As far as Megadeth songs go, this is one of my favorites: It’s the first I heard all-the-way-through for them, and even though the main guitar riff sounds simplistic, it’s also beefy and crunchy, in a way that really digs in. It’s political meanings, along with watching Dave Mustaine (lead singer/guitarist) take a stand on MTV as part of “Rock The Vote” got me involved in politics at an early age. It’s simplicity is part of what makes it work: At the time this came out, only their rival Metallica was having luck staying on the radio with the new wave of music called grunge and alternative, not to be confused with the gangsta rap explosion. Almost everyone doing metal in the 80’s was losing out, and while Pantera was just throwing fuel onto their fire, This songs was one of the few sparks outside of Metallica to really shine. Sometimes simplicity is all you need.
Normally, this will appear at noon or, worst case scenario, 6 pm. Yesterday, like today and tomorrow, I have a pretty busy schedule at school, as I had to turn paperwork in yesterday, take an exam today, and get some homework turned in tomorrow. Technically, this is yesterday’s post, and the choice of song fits closest to some of the more painful aspects of my day.
I’m not going to waste too much time on the subject of my health right now because I am focused on a couple of complex problems that, for the moment, I can deal with. I’m stuck in a cycle I am trying to beat on my own, not by choice, but because I am stuck in a few systems that I can’t easily escape. Rather than whine and cry about those problems (something I do enough of on Facebook), I’m focused on the problems I can deal with, saving those things I need help with for when those opportunities come up. Some parts of the problem will (hopefully) be resolved soon; some won’t. Until then, be patient, try to solve the problems when you can, and hope that things work out.
The point is that, even if I hunt at a problem through a song or post, it means nothing. I know this song’s about masterbation, but there are other places to stink, as well as attitudes (and other objects and ideas) that “stink.” Without the problems, it’s still one of my favorite tool songs, and the biggest reason why I bought “AEnima.”
Your normal post should be here tomorrow.
Welcome back! We’re setting the tone this week on another mood-setting Monday (Moody Monday? I named it last week, forgot what I called it!) with something from back when I was a kid.
Gangsta rap, something that was mainly underground during the 80’s, was becoming mainstream around the time I hit middle school in 1990/1991. Towards the end of the 80’s and the beginning of the 90’s rappers like MC Hammer and Vanilla Ice were the ones making it cool, while Dr. Dre would drop “Nuthin’ but a G Thang” in 1992. When you’re a kid, the lyrics don’t matter that much; if it had a cool beat, you danced to it.
This was one of those songs with a cool beat, a simple chorus, and something so simple to dance to that almost anyone can do it: All you had to do was jump at the right times. It was one of those songs that had to be played at least once at every school and Boys Club dance, and one where only a few did not participate.
One thing that surprises me, however, is that it’s still popular amongst sporting events: in some places, such as the University of Wisconsin, it’s a big deal. As you can see below, the whole student section gets involved all the way through the first chorus. You can read more about it here: http://college.answers.com/sports/history-of-the-university-of-wisconsins-jump-around-tradition .
That’s the kind of mood we need to start the week off with: Something that’ll make you bounce!